Movie Reviews 21 – Psycho

Seeing as this is the 50th anniversary of the release of Psycho, I thought it was high time to rewatch the original and the three sequels that followed, none of which I had bothered with before. The task was made easy for me as I found a DVD set with all three sequels in the $5 bin. All I had to track down was …

Psycho (1960)
A classic if there ever was one. I suspect that there are millions of people today that have never watched Psycho that still recognize the shrill string sounds of “The Shower Scene”, perhaps not even knowing that it is a reference to the movie. The Bernard Herrman score is almost as famous as Alfred Hitchcock directing the movie. And last, but not least, Robert Bloch’s novel on which the movie is based and the screenplay by Joseph (original Outer Limits) Stephano. Psycho is the one creative production for which each of these four people are most associated with, and for which one could argue each did their best work. The movie broke numerous ‘rules’ of filmmaking at the time, my favorite being the sudden death of the main character midway through the movie. So if you happen to be one of the few people on the planet who has not seen the movie, I’m sure not going to spoil it by explaining it. At the end you’ll know exactly why the name Norman Bates and the Bates Motel elicits fear at their mere mention. Anthony Perkins, Janet Leigh, Vera Miles and even bit player Martin Balsam probably put in the performances of their respective careers. It’s a great classic movie. Just watch it.

Psycho II (1983)
Although it took a long time getting around to putting a sequel out, and of course there was no way that it could live up to the original, it was certainly an entertaining movie. Norman Bates has paid his debt to society by now and has been released from the mental institution. He returns to his iconic house and to the Bates Motel which is being run by an appointed caretaker (Denis Franz). The caretaker is running the hotel as a love nest for quickie encounters and immediately raises the ire of Norman. But Norman seeks a regular job at a local rest-stop eatery as a short order cook and quickly befriends one of the younger waitresses (Meg Tilly). When she gets put out by her boyfriend she reluctantly accepts a free room with Norman. But all is not well with Norman as he begins to see notes from ‘Mother’. He is also being harassed by the sister of Marion Crane (as famously portrayed by Janet Leigh in the original). She’s not satisfied that Norman has been rehabilitated and is intent on getting him back to jail, one way or another. It’s a well built mystery as we try to figure out if Norman is really going bonkers again or if he is really being set up. Sure, it’s no Psycho, but it’s a decent sequel.

Psycho III (1986)
This movie starts out in a weird manner. A young woman dressed as a nun is holed up in a church tower and about to jump down to end it all. A bunch of nuns below are clamoring for her to get back in and as she hesitates other nuns are rushing to her from within the tower stairs. But as they try to pull her back into the tower, one of the nuns is cast off into the depths of the tower and plunges to her death. It seems the young nun apprentice had doubts about her faith and after the mishap she is cast out from the convent into the desert. She hitches a ride from a young wannabe rockstar drifter who ditches her in the middle of a storm at night when she rejects his advances. As can be expected, her journey brings her to the Bates motel. Unfortunately, the drifter is also there as the new motel caretaker. She reluctantly stays as she has nowhere else to go and befriends Norman. But Norman has his own problems in the guise of a snooping reporter writing a piece about serial killers. And then the inevitable rash of murders begin. Is it the nutty drifter? The failed nun? The reporter? Or is it … Norman? I should point out that Anthony Perkins directed this one himself.

Psycho IV: The Beginning (1990)
Easily the worst of the Psycho movies. I was immediately put off by the setup wherein Norman calls into a talk radio call-in show in which serial killers are being discussed. The radio host and guests soon figure out that the caller is the infamous Norman Bates, but the kicker is that he has said that he intends to kill again, but for a special reason. It appears that Norman is happily married at this point in his life, but there is one ‘small’ problem with his wife and for this he intends to kill her. The movie is paced by the calls Norman makes to the show, phone calls between himself and his wife, and studio scenes where they discuss first the mystery of who the caller is and then how to locate him and keep him talking on the air so he can be traced. I must admit that Norman’s reasoning is not to be dismissed outright which rekindles the argument as to whether he is good/bad, sane/insane, but other than that, there isn’t much more to the movie. I found the whole ‘call in show’ premise boring. I later learned that this was a made-for-TV movie which somewhat explains it’s inferiority. Also surprising is that a young Mick Garris directed this movie before finding success with the “Masters of Horror” series and a few other notable horror movies.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: